Home » Forum Home » General

Topic: g-pente
Replies: 1   Views: 29,845   Pages: 1   Last Post: Nov 30, 2000, 4:14 AM by: progambler

Search Forum

Back to Topic List Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
Replies: 1   Views: 29,845   Pages: 1  
happy

Posts: 15
Registered: Dec 16, 2001
g-pente
Posted: Nov 28, 2000, 11:07 PM

got a chance to play some g-pente (and d-pente)
over the holidays. We found g-pente to be very good
for an over the board game. Wonder who has the
advantage in g-pente? Experience will tell us
soon.

I have a suggestion. I don't think it would be a
huge problem to add to g-pente the restriction that
x<>y for p1's second move. (ie. diagonals also off
limits!) I don't know but I would bet that p1 has a slight
advantage elsewise.

Does anybody else
agree?

Best, happy



This message was originally posted at Yahoo's pente group.


progambler

Posts: 79
Registered: Dec 16, 2001
From: Lenexa, KS
Age: 42
Re: g-pente
Posted: Nov 30, 2000, 4:14 AM

I haven't found the diagonal moves 3 or 4 spaces
from the center in G-Pente to offer player 1 (P1) any
advantage, assuming that P2's move 1 is a 'diagonal' instead
of a 'straight' move in relation to P1's first move,
i.e. L11, L9, etc. (or R1U1, R1D1 etc. using old
notation).

If P2 plays a 'straight' move in relation to P1's
first move, i.e. K11 or L10, then I believe P1 probably
get's a bit of an advantage with a diagonal move 3 (or
maybe 4) spaces out.

Bottom line, P2 should
probably stick with a diagonal move 1 in G-Pente, unless
he goes for a keystone attack like in regular
tourney-rule Pente with O11 followed by O9. (R4U1 followed by
R2U1)

Actually the diagonal move 2, whether it be 3 or 4 spaces
out, by P1 vs. a diagonal move 1 by P2 is probably an
advantage for P2.

I believe that P1 has a VERY
slight advantage in G-Pente with it's current rules. The
reason is the one that Happy stated in his other memo.
It appears that N12 or M13 (R3U2 or R2U3) does
afford him that slight advantage. I don't believe
restricting the diagonal move 3 or 4 spaces out would make
much difference.

By the way Happy, your
x<>y description for describing diagonals was
technically incorrect. A diagonal move could also be x=3 and
y=-3. It should read ABS(x)<>ABS(y), where
ABS=absolute value. (LOL) I couldn't resist throwing that one
in, since you were getting fancy with the
terminology!

Gary



This message was originally posted at Yahoo's pente group.

Replies: 1   Views: 29,845   Pages: 1  
Back to Topic List
Topics: [ Previous | Next ]


Powered by Jive Software